what college course is better .........?

answers1: philosophy because it's specific to some particular field...
humanities is non-specific and could be taught 100 different ways.
<br>
<br>
i'm a philosophy major graduate and a humanities MA graduate, having
written my MA thesis in philosophy <br>
<br>
and i'm just offering my opinion here. philosophy beats "humanities"
general courses any day of the week. more useful, looks better on a
transcript, etc.
answers2: I'd say philosophy, it's taken more seriously. Humanities
is almost as bad as general studies, it sounds indecisive. <br>
<br>
Philosophers are indecisive, but at least you've decided something.
Also, I know philosophy grads with real jobs (game designer, think
tank writer, etc). <br>
<br>
Humanities? I think the guy who works at the supermarket graduated
from that six years ago (he has an interview for assistant manager
next month, wish him luck).
answers3: Humanities! Humanities is easy whereas with philosophy you
have to think too much lol.
answers4: Humanities its more diverse whereas philosophy is more of a
concentrated focus.

In the Arts & Humanities category, what would be considered under the sub-category Other - Arts & Humanity?

answers1: An overall discussion of the Humanities as a whole. <br>
<br>
Things like linguistics, language, astronomy, and music are found
elsewhere, despite tradition.
answers2: Jewelry, ceramics or pottery, weaving etc. etc. etc.

What can you do with a degree in Humanities?

answers1: Ask that imoortal question that everyone is dying to ask,
"Would you like fries with that?" or "Would you like that
super-sized?" A degree in the humanities that is not backed up with a
practical degree like business, is not certified to teach, or which is
not continued to a masters level prepares you to enter the service
industry. A degree in the humanities is not a practical degree unless
you are looking to graduate school or law school.
answers2: teach. <br>
also, you could always minor in an additional field (buisness, art,
social work, history) and open up more job opportunities
answers3: It all depends on what subjects you are taking and what your
interests are. I am almost finished my BA in English and Geography
and have the option of journalist, librarian, writer, teacher or
editor with English and with Geography any number of jobs in a city
council, or wider governmental groups. Another area in geography is
aid work in underdeveloped countries, which I think would be really
interesting. <br>
<br>
With most university's they offer a leg up into jobs, if you want to
take the opportunities, with exchange programs and further courses
into areas of interest. They also offer post graduate diplomas which
greatly increase your chances of getting a high paying job in your
chosen area. It all depends on what you are wanting to study and what
you think you might like to do at the end. There are a range of
fantastic jobs through doing humanities, some of the better ones I
have heard of are joining the United Nations through taking history
and political studies. <br>
<br>
In saying that the sciences have a highly employment guarantee, partly
due to the foregrounded importance to environmental issues. But you
have to go with your interests, there is no point getting stuck in a
boring degree, that you have absolutely no interest in, feeling way
out of your depth, which leads onto an equally uninteresting job. <br>
<br>
Good Luck!! I'm sure what ever you decide to do will pay off in the end! :)

What is humanities and human resources?

answers1: Humanities is the bunch of fields such as languages, arts,
literature. <br>
<br>
Human resources used to be called personnel -- it's the department in
a company that deals with employees; advertises positions and collects
resumes; administers benefits and pay; lays down workplace rules;
stuff like that. <br>
<br>
They have nothing to do with each other.
answers2: human resourses is about employers and employees, and
humanities have nothing to do with that.

Art teacher's or art lover's help.?

answers1: You can find an artist as your friend.
answers2: I think you should do some reading, or visit an art museum
or gallery. Explore what kind of art and artist you like. There are
many people who love art that are not artists, like art historians, or
dealers. <br>
<br>
I believe you can find out what you like about art on your own.
answers3: Not much of a speller either.

What are the best books on art museums?

answers1: The Art Museum from Boullee to Bilbao, by Andrew McClellan <br>
The Two Art Histories, ed. by Charles W. Haxthausen <br>
<br>
(among others)
answers2: Contents, Architecture, History? <br>
Contents - the museums themselves usually put out the best of these.

Does art have to be didactic to be art?

answers1: No I don't think it has to be at all . And it does not have
to be, either. There are some really grotesque paintings out there
that are neither pleasurable or nice to look at. But it is still are
none the less and they are famous also <br>
One comes to mind <br>
( The Scream )
answers2: Absolutely not. In fact, "didacticism" in art has been a
diminishing concept since the late 18th, early 19th centuries, though
previously, critics and theorists often had problems with art if it
WASN'T didactic -- that is, if it didn't instruct as well as provide
pleasure. Even so, there were plenty of 16th-18th-century works that
provided pleasure only, and even some from the Greek and Roman
periods. Much art in history has been solely about "delighting the
eye." <br>
<br>
Today, we want art to be visually provocative, to make people think,
but that doesn't necessarily demand that it provide a "teaching
moment," some sort of lesson, which is what didacticism is all about.
Visual provocation need not be traditonally or conventionally
"pleasurable" (there are artists whose work can be described as far
from pleasant but who are certainly provocative), and there are also
fine artists whose work is simply beautiful to see.